PART ONE
The Credit Scoring Site
A bleak account
Google
Web     creditscoring.com     creditaccuracy.com
 
 

PART TWO
creditaccuracy.com
Dirty Data

creditscoring.com
in the media

HowStuffWorks
Clark Howard
Federal Reserve
Chicago Tribune
Christian Science Monitor
Columbus Dispatch
Augusta Chronicle
Bankrate.com
Bankrate.com
Realty Times
Realty Times
Newsweek
Nolo
Nolo: Credit Repair
About.com
MoneyCentral Radio
The Detroit News, July 17, 2000
Money Maze Radio
USA Today Hot Site, 9/17/98
654 days 4 years of Wikipedia malarkey



Wikipedia error on credit score utilization ratio

4 years and running

Also, see


6/26/2009

After a year and nine months of balderdash, the 678 credit score myth on Wikipedia finally died on May 22, 2009.

But another error beats that one by years. Wikipedia states

"FICO has disclosed the following components and the approximate weighted contribution of each:... 30% — Credit Utilization - The ratio of current revolving debt (such as credit card balances) to the total available revolving credit (credit limits)."

However, what FICO (the credit score company) really says is that an entire category makes up 30% of the importance of the score. The category "Amounts Owed," includes 5 other factors. "Proportion of credit lines used" is only one of the six and, indeed, is listed fifth. For instance, "Number of accounts with balances" is also part of the same 30%, but Wikipedia fails to mention that factor. So, it is mathematically impossible— unless the other 5 factors of the category are all zero— for the so-called "ratio" to account for 30% of the importance of the FICO score.

The screw-up was originated on April 11, 2005 by Wikipedia user 209.150.74.26 who hasn't been seen for over two years, and whose contribution to the world's knowledge includes parts of articles about something called "Opie and Anthony" and the television show "Vega$."

DrVeghead ("Now a doctor! Still, no longer a veghead.") added the 30% notation 11 days later.

While that foolishness remained, other pressing matters were debated: Important issues like the proper use of the apostrophe, and the relative merits of the terms credit agency vs. credit bureau (neither are correct (15 U.S.C. 1681a(d)(1)))

Kat Malone, where are you?


creditscoring on twitter Facebook Page:  The Credit Scoring Site, creditscoring.com
email
contact
XML button


Lines are drawn

Are you a Believer or Nonbeliever—are they really used in jobs? Credit score use by employers showdown.


April, 1997: "Information on how to obtain one's credit score is suspiciously absent from your site. How do I get mine?"

"And we're not running a game show. I mean, we're evaluating risk. We're not trying to have people get--achieve the highest score."

"Fisher is a fan of going by the book and then beyond it."

"He beat the scoring proponents to the punch by scooping up the web address http://www.creditscoring.com, from which he launches often strident, sometimes wacky, but usually well-documented attacks on the credit-scoring concept and the industries that support it."

Realty Consumers Empowered By Online "Peoples" Court - "His Web site CreditScoring.com helped him-- and millions of other consumers-- extend fair credit reporting rights to credit scoring information."

"Fisher operates the www.creditscoring.com Web site, which skewers the secrecy of the credit bureaus and Fair, Isaac." - The Detroit News

"CreditScoring.com is an exceptionally-interesting site that offers news and information regarding credit scoring and-- really-- the entire credit process."

"'Garbage in, garbage out,' says Greg Fisher of Dayton, Ohio, who runs two Web sites on the subject, creditscoring.com and creditaccuracy.com."